Corporate Presentation Disclaimer

Achievement of Agrios Global Holdings Ltd.’s (“Agrios” or the “Company”) business plan involves significant risk. Certain information contained herein, including any information as to future financial results; share value; or operating performance and other statements that express expectations or estimates of future performance, constitute “forward-looking statements” or “forward-looking information”, as defined in applicable securities law. For example, statements about expected timelines for product acquisition and launches, completing financings, finalizing collaborations and contractual arrangements, market growth and size, Agrios’ strategies and objectives, future revenues, profits, expected timing and receipt of necessary government licensing, forecast number of product lines and sales, planned partnerships and commencement of operations are all forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates, assumptions, expectations and projections that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. In making the forward-looking statements contained herein, the Company has made various material assumptions. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual financial results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the estimated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements and the forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, see “Risk Factors”. Except as required by law, Agrios disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, events or otherwise. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

Future-oriented financial information and financial outlooks, as with forward-looking information generally, are, without limitation, based on the assumptions and subject to the risks set out herein. The Company’s results of operations may differ materially from management’s current expectations. Such information is presented for illustrative purposes only and may not bean indication of the Company’s actual results of operations or earnings.

The focus of Agrios’ business is the cannabis industry. The production, distribution, sale and use of marijuana and its derivatives are still illegal in some of the jurisdictions in which Agrios operates or intends to operate, including under federal law of the United States, despite being legalized under certain state and local laws, including the states in which Agrios currently operates. These laws and their enforcement are in flux and vary dramatically from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. The enforcement of these laws and its affect on Agrios and its business, employees, directors and shareholders are uncertain and accordingly involve considerable risk.

Information contained herein may have been obtained by the Company from third parties, including but not limited to market data. The Company believes such information to be accurate, but has not independently verified such information. To the extent such information obtained from third party sources, there is a risk that the assumptions made and conclusions drawn by the Company based on such representations are not accurate.

The following summary is subject to the express provisions of the applicable securities laws, regulations and rules, and reference is made thereto for the complete text of such provisions.

Cannabis Related Practices or Activities are Illegal Under US Federal Laws

The Company is an entity that has an ancillary involvement in the United States cannabis industry insofar as its business activities are ancillary to the production, manufacturing and distribution of cannabis-related products where use of cannabis is legal for medical and/or adult use purposes, as applicable. While some states in the United States have authorized the use and sale of cannabis, it remains illegal under federal law. The concepts of “medical cannabis” and “recreational cannabis” do not exist under U.S. federal law. The U.S. federal Controlled Substances Act classifies “marijuana” as a Schedule I drug. Accordingly, cannabis-related practices or activities, including without limitation, the manufacture, importation, possession, use or distribution of cannabis are illegal under U.S. federal law. Strict compliance with state laws with respect to cannabis will neither absolve the Company of liability under U.S. federal law, nor will it provide a defense to any federal proceeding which may be brought against the Company. Any such proceedings brought against the Company may adversely affect the Company’s operations and financial performance.

Cautionary Note to United States Investors

The securities of the Company described herein have not been and will not be registered under any United States federal or state securities law and may not be offered and sold to a U.S. Person (as defined under Rule 902(k) of Regulation S under the U.S. Securities Act), or to, or for the account or benefit of a U.S. Person or a person in the United States absent United States registration or an applicable exemption from the United States registration requirements and any applicable state securities laws, provided, however, that securities may be offered and sold to an investor that is an “accredited investor” as defined in Regulation D of the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “U.S. Securities Act”).

Prospective investors who are U.S. Persons will be required to represent, among other things, that they qualify as “accredited investors” and are familiar with and understand the terms of the offering and have all requisite authority to make such investment.


The securities will not be and have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act or the securities laws of any state of the United States, and if sold in the United States will be “restricted securities” within the meaning of Rule 144 under the U.S. Securities Act. The securities may be resold, pledged or otherwise transferred only pursuant to an effective registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act or pursuant to an applicable exemption from the registration requirements of the U.S. Securities Act.

Return of Materials

If the recipient of this presentation determines not to purchase any securities or the offering is terminated, the recipient will promptly return all material received in connection herewith without retaining any copies to: 1980 – 1075 West Georgia Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6E 3C9, Canada

Risk Factors

Investing in the Company’s securities involves significant risks. Prior to making an investment decision, a prospective purchaser of the Company’s securities should carefully consider the risk factors described below together with the risk factors contained in the Company’s disclosure documents filed with the securities regulators and available at, which are incorporated herein by reference. If any of the identified risks, or any other risks and uncertainties that we have not yet identified or that we currently consider not to be material, actually occur or become material risks, the business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company could be materially and adversely affected. In that event, the market price of our Common Shares could decline and you could lose part or all of your investment.

Market and Industry Data

The information contained herein include market and industry data that has been obtained from third party sources, including industry publications. Agrios believes that the industry data is accurate and that the estimates and assumptions are reasonable, but there is no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of the data. Third party sources generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there is no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of included information. Although the data is believed to be reliable, the parties have not independently verified any of the data from third party sources referred to in this presentation or ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon by such sources.

Nature of the Business Model

The primary businesses of the Company (through one or more operating companies owned by the Company) are intended to be:

  • the leasing of turnkey commercial real estate to marijuana producers and processors in the State of Washington; and
  • the providing of other products and services to “marijuana producers” and “marijuana processors”. Because the production and sale of recreational cannabis remain illegal under U.S. federal law, it is possible that the Company’s future tenants and customers may be forced to cease activities. The U.S. federal government, through both the Drug Enforcement Agency (“DEA”) and Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), has the right to actively investigate, audit and shut-down marijuana growing facilities, processors and retailers. The U.S. federal government may also attempt to seize the Company’s property. Any action taken by the DEA and/or the IRS to interfere with, seize, or shut down a tenant’s operations will have an adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results and financial condition

Some of the Company’s planned business activities, while believed to be compliant with applicable certain U.S. state and local law, are illegal under United States federal law.

Unlike in Canada which has federal legislation uniformly governing the cultivation, distribution, sale and possession of medical and recreational marijuana under the Cannabis Act and the regulations thereunder, investors are cautioned that in the United States, marijuana is largely regulated at the state level. Although certain states and territories of the U.S. authorize medical or recreational cannabis production and distribution by licensed or registered entities, under U.S. federal law, the possession, use, cultivation, and transfer of cannabis and any related drug paraphernalia is illegal and any such acts are criminal acts under federal law under any and all circumstances under the U.S. Controlled Substances Act (“CSA”). An investor’s contribution to and involvement in such activities may result in federal civil and/or criminal prosecution, including forfeiture of his, her or its entire investment.

Violations of any federal laws and regulations could result in significant fines, penalties, administrative sanctions, convictions or settlements arising from civil proceedings conducted by either the federal government or private citizens, or criminal charges, including but not limited to disgorgement of profits, cessation of business activities or divestiture. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company, including its reputation and ability to conduct business, its holding (directly or indirectly) of marijuana licenses in the United States, the listing of its securities on various stock exchanges, its financial position, operating results, profitability or liquidity or the market price of its publicly traded shares.

In addition, it is difficult to estimate the time or resources that would be needed for the investigation of any such matters or its final resolution because, in part, the time and resources that may be needed are dependent on the nature and extent of any information requested by the applicable authorities involved, and such time or resources could be substantial.

In addition, since the possession and use of cannabis and any related drug paraphernalia is illegal under U.S. federal law, the Company may be deemed to be aiding and abetting illegal activities through the contracts it has entered and the products that it intends to provide. The Company’s current business model is to lease real estate, provide material supply agreements, and provide intellectual property to a licensed “marijuana producer” and “marijuana processor” in Washington State.

As a result, U.S. law enforcement authorities, in their attempt to regulate the illegal use of cannabis and any related drug paraphernalia, may seek to bring an action or actions against the Company, including, but not limited to, aiding and abetting another’s criminal activities. The Federal aiding and abetting statute provide that anyone who “commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal.” As a result of such an action, the Company may be forced to cease operations and its investors could lose their entire investment. Such an action would have a material negative effect on our business and operations.

The Company’s investments and operations in the United States may be subject to heightened scrutiny.

For the reasons set forth above, the Company’s existing investments and operations in the United States, and any future investments or operations, may become the subject of heightened scrutiny by regulators, stock exchanges and other authorities in Canada. As a result, the Company may be subject to significant direct and indirect interaction with public officials. There can be no assurance that this heightened scrutiny will not in turn lead to the imposition of certain restrictions on the Company’s ability to invest in the United States or any other jurisdiction.

Government policy changes or public opinion may also result in a significant influence over the regulation of the cannabis industry in Canada, the United States or elsewhere. A negative shift in the public’s perception of medical or recreational cannabis in the United States or any other applicable jurisdiction could affect future legislation or regulation. Among other things, such a shift could cause state jurisdictions to abandon initiatives or proposals to legalize medical and/or recreational marijuana.

On August 29, 2013, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) issued a memorandum known as the “Cole Memorandum” to all U.S. Attorneys’ offices (federal prosecutors). Although the DOJ has stated in the Cole Memorandum that it is not an efficient use of limited resources to direct federal law enforcement agencies to prosecute those abiding by state laws allowing the use and distribution of medical cannabis, there is no guarantee that the DOJ’s position in this regard will not change with respect to medical cannabis or apply a different standard to recreational cannabis. While not legally binding, and merely prosecutorial guidance, the Cole Memorandum laid a framework for managing the tension between state and federal laws concerning state regulated marijuana businesses.

However, on January 4, 2018 the Cole Memorandum was revoked by Attorney General Jeff Sessions, a long-time opponent of state-regulated medical and recreational cannabis. While this did not create a change in federal law, as the Cole Memorandum was not itself law, the revocation removed the DOJ’s guidance to U.S. Attorneys that state regulated cannabis industries substantively in compliance with the Cole Memorandum’s guidelines should not be a prosecutorial priority.

In addition to his revocation of the Cole Memorandum, Attorney General Sessions also issued a one-page memorandum known as the “Sessions Memorandum.” The Sessions Memorandum confirmed the rescission of the Cole Memorandum and explained the rationale of the DOJ in doing so: the Cole Memorandum, according to the Sessions Memorandum, was “unnecessary” due to existing general enforcement guidance adopted in the 1980s, as set forth in the U.S. Attorney’s Manual (the “USAM”). The USAM enforcement priorities, like those of the Cole Memorandum, are also based on the federal government’s limited resources, and include “law enforcement priorities set by the Attorney General,” the “seriousness” of the alleged crimes, the “deterrent effect of criminal prosecution,” and “the cumulative impact of particular crimes on the community.”

While the Sessions Memorandum emphasizes that marijuana is a Schedule I controlled substance, and reiterates the statutory view that cannabis is a “dangerous drug and that marijuana activity is a serious crime,” it does not otherwise indicate that the prosecution of marijuana-related offenses is now a DOJ priority. Furthermore, the Sessions Memorandum explicitly describes itself as a guide to prosecutorial discretion. Such discretion is firmly in the hands of U.S. Attorneys in deciding whether or not to prosecute marijuana-related offenses. Our outside U.S. counsel continuously monitors all U.S. Attorney comments related to regulated medical and adult-use cannabis laws to assess various risks and enforcement priorities within each jurisdiction. Dozens of U.S. Attorneys across the country have affirmed that their view of federal enforcement priorities has not changed, although a few have displayed greater ambivalence.

It is too soon to determine what prosecutorial effects will be created by the rescission of the Cole Memorandum. While initial fears of a nationwide “crackdown” have not yet materialized, considerable uncertainty remains.

Regardless, marijuana remains a Schedule I controlled substance at the federal level, and neither the Cole Memorandum nor its rescission has altered that fact. The federal government of the United States has always reserved the right to enforce federal law in regard to the sale and disbursement of medical or recreational marijuana, even if state law sanctioned such sale and disbursement. From a regulatory and enforcement perspective, the criminal risk today remains identical to the risk on January 3, 2018. It remains unclear whether the risk of enforcement has been altered.

Due to the classification of cannabis as a Schedule I controlled substance under the CSA, banks and other financial institutions which service the cannabis industry are at risk of violating certain financial laws, including anti-money laundering statutes.

Because the manufacture, distribution, and dispensation of cannabis remains illegal under the CSA, banks and other financial institutions providing services to cannabis-related businesses risk violation of federal anti-money laundering statutes (18 U.S.C. §§ 1956 and 1957), the unlicensed money-remitter statute (18 U.S.C. § 1960) and the U.S. Bank Secrecy Act. These statutes can impose criminal liability for engaging in certain financial and monetary transactions with the proceeds of a “specified unlawful activity” such as distributing controlled substances which are illegal under federal law, including cannabis, and for failing to identify or report financial transactions that involve the proceeds of cannabis-related violations of the CSA. The Company may also be exposed to the foregoing risks.

In the event that any of the Company’s investments, or any proceeds thereof, any dividends or distributions therefrom, or any profits or revenues accruing from such investments in the United States were found to be in violation of money laundering legislation or otherwise, such transactions may be viewed as proceeds of crime under one or more of the statutes noted above or any other applicable legislation. This could restrict or otherwise jeopardize the ability of the Company to declare or pay dividends, effect other distributions or subsequently repatriate such funds back to Canada. Furthermore, while the Company has no current intention to declare or pay dividends in the foreseeable future, in the event that a determination was made that any such investments in the United States could reasonably be shown to constitute proceeds of crime, the Company may decide or be required to suspend declaring or paying dividends without advance notice and for an indefinite period of time.

Subscribe for email updates